Silver Screen Standards: The Harvey Girls (1946)

Silver Screen Standards: The Harvey Girls (1946)

The Harvey Girls (1946) Movie Poster
The Harvey Girls (1946)

I’ve had a particular fondness for The Harvey Girls (1946) since the first time I saw it, but my love increased when I visited the El Tovar Hotel in the Grand Canyon some years ago and learned more about the fascinating history of the real Harvey Girls who brought beefsteak and civilized manners to the Western frontier. The exhibit at the hotel included references to the 1946 Judy Garland film, which is dedicated to the women who went West on the Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe railroad in order to work in Fred Harvey’s establishments. Sadly, not everyone gets the chance to visit one of the few remaining Harvey Houses, but they can watch Garland and a fantastic supporting cast in this energetic Western musical from director George Sidney. While it’s not a perfect movie, it is one of my very favorite Judy Garland films, not only because I like the protagonist Garland plays but because I absolutely adore Angela Lansbury, Marjorie Main, and Virginia O’Brien, and having all of them in the same picture is really a treat.

Garland plays Susan Bradley, who answers a matrimonial ad and agrees to ride the train all the way to Sandrock to marry a man she only knows through his letters. When that doesn’t turn out as expected, Susan joins a troop of Harvey Girls arriving at the same time and gets to work feeding passengers and locals at the Harvey House. The local saloon crowd isn’t happy about the competition or the idea of Sandrock settling down into a respectable town, but only the duplicitous Judge Purvis (Preston Foster) is villainous enough to terrorize the newcomers with increasingly nasty tricks. Even as they fend off the judge’s attacks, the girls find romance in unexpected places, and sparks fly between Susan and the owner of the Alhambra saloon, Ned Trent (John Hodiak), much to the disgruntlement of Ned’s usual squeeze, saloon singer Em (Angela Lansbury).

The Harvey Girls (1946) Virginia O'Brien
On the train to Sandrock, Alma (Virginia O’Brien) and some of the other new recruits review the handbook for Harvey waitress conduct. The real Harvey Girls were bound by strict rules and regulations.

The Harvey Girls offers a distinctly feminine perspective on going West, even if it omits the worst dangers and hardships of the experience in favor of Technicolor song and dance. The girls might be nice young ladies from back East, but they’re hardier than they first appear, a point made abundantly clear in the glorious free-for-all fight with the dance hall demimondes. Susan’s friend Alma (Virginia O’Brien) turns out to be skilled at shoeing horses and working a blacksmith’s forge, while Susan herself grabs a pair of pistols and marches into the saloon to retrieve the hotel’s stolen meat. It’s very satisfying to see the ladies of the film so capable and determined in spite of the obstacles they face, and by the end of the picture, we even see Susan and Em reach an appreciation of each other. Two older women are in charge of the girls, and they’re both sturdy, reassuring presences; Miss Bliss (Selena Royle) doesn’t have enough scenes to be fully developed, but Sonora (Marjorie Main) steals almost every scene she’s in, and she even strikes up a romance of her own with Susan’s mail-order groom, Hartsey (Chill Wills). On the less reputable side of the street, we have Em, a more complicated character but not really a bad one even if she resents Susan for trespassing on her territory.

The Harvey Girls (1946) John Hodiak
Handsome Ned Trent (John Hodiak) runs the local saloon but harbors secret depths that attract Susan in spite of her anger with Ned for writing the letters that drew her out West to marry Hartsey.

While the women get the greater part of my devotion, I can’t fault the male cast, either, especially John Hodiak as Ned. His rakish, toothy grin provides good cover for the surprisingly fair-minded and even poetic side of Ned’s personality, and he has excellent chemistry with Garland. Seeing Ray Bolger reunited with Garland is also a delight, even if we don’t get to see much of his character’s developing relationship with Virginia O’Brien’s Alma. Their plotline disappears because Garland’s delays on set caused the pregnant O’Brien to be too far along to hide her condition any longer, and as a result, Alma vanishes about halfway through the picture, right after her wonderful “Wild, Wild West” number. Kenny Baker only has a few scenes as the piano playing love interest for Cyd Charisse, but they look very sweet together in their one big number. Chill Wills actually gets more screen time than Baker, thanks to Hartsey’s initial encounter with Susan and growing camaraderie with Sonora, but he’s a lovable genre stalwart who helps the movie feel more like an actual Western.

The Harvey Girls (1946) Angela Lansbury as Em pink feathers
Angela Lansbury looks fantastic in the bright costumes worn by saloon singer Em, even if her singing voice is inexplicably dubbed for her musical numbers.

The music for this picture also makes me love it, even if Angela Lansbury’s singing is being dubbed for reasons I will never comprehend. “On the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe” won the Academy Award for Best Original Song, and it really is an earworm, although I also love Virginia O’Brien’s hilarious delivery of “The Wild, Wild West.” The movie has so many song-and-dance numbers that it rockets along, much like the train barreling West. It’s hard to believe that several musical numbers were removed from the picture before its release, and there’s never a point where a song really feels like it’s missing. Dances accompany most of the major musical moments; Ray Bolger’s extended solo at the Harvey party is a highlight, and Cyd Charisse, in her first speaking role as Susan’s friend Deborah, gets a couple of smaller dance scenes. I also really like the quieter segment that features “It’s a Great Big World” with Garland and O’Brien (and Charisse dubbed by Marion Doenges). In fact, the biggest flaw in the movie is that O’Brien is in it just enough to hook us on her performance and then vanishes thanks to the delays and her own impending maternity. When MGM dropped her contract in 1948 they made a huge mistake and cost all of us the chance to see O’Brien reach her full potential as a brilliant singing comedy star.

The Harvey Girls (1946) Cyd Charisse, Judy Garland, and Virginia O’Brien
Cyd Charisse, Judy Garland, and Virginia O’Brien lament together in the musical number, “It’s a Great Big World.”

Hopefully, this delightful movie will inspire you to learn more about Harvey Girls’ history or take a train trip out West yourself. You could even take the Grand Canyon Railway to the South Rim and visit the El Tovar Hotel and Bright Angel Lodge. Another Harvey Hotel still in operation today is La Posada in Winslow, Arizona, whose famous guests have included Betty Grable, John Wayne, and Amelia Earhart. If travel isn’t an option, try more classic movie musicals about Wild West women, including Calamity Jane (1953), Red Garters (1954), and Cat Ballou (1965). Don’t miss Westward the Women (1951) if you want a more dramatic take on women’s frontier experiences.

— Jennifer Garlen for Classic Movie Hub

Jennifer Garlen pens our monthly Silver Screen Standards column. You can read all of Jennifer’s Silver Screen Standards articles here.

Jennifer is a former college professor with a PhD in English Literature and a lifelong obsession with film. She writes about classic movies at her blog, Virtual Virago, and presents classic film programs for lifetime learning groups and retirement communities. She’s the author of Beyond Casablanca: 100 Classic Movies Worth Watching and its sequel, Beyond Casablanca II: 101 Classic Movies Worth Watching, and she is also the co-editor of two books about the works of Jim Henson.

Posted in Posts by Jennifer Garlen, Silver Screen Standards | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Monsters and Matinees: Honoring Ray Harryhausen, a ‘Titan of Cinema’

Honoring Ray Harryhausen, a ‘Titan of Cinema’

Picture yourself standing in the middle of a fight with Ray Harryhausen’s skeleton army from Jason and the Argonauts.

OK, it’s not the “real” skeletons, but it’s still pretty cool experience. This movie magic is an augmented reality that is one of the outstanding features of the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art’s Ray Harryhausen: Titan of Cinema.

As dreamy as that sounds for Harryhausen fans, traveling to Scotland, especially for those outside of the United Kingdom, may still not be an option. But I wouldn’t tease you – or me – if there wasn’t a way we could see the exhibit.

Ray Harryhausen animating a skeleton model from “The 7th Voyage of Sinbad.” (© The Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation)

Understanding the extensive Harryhausen fandom across the world, the gallery has created a virtual experience we can explore from anywhere. Yes, we’re all feeling “virtual” fatigue right now – especially since virtual events can fall short of the in-person experience – but this is very good and worth your time.

Ray Harryhausen: Titan of Cinema Virtual Exhibition Experience works well because it provides a visual experience close to what we would have in the museum – sans fighting with a skeleton. There are original sketches, storyboards, photos, memorabilia and models like Medusa, Gwangi and Pegasus. Video is of Harryhausen’s test footage, dailies and early films. Other videos allow us to hear from the man himself as well his daughter, Vanessa, who talks about watching her father work in their home.

I feel info about the exhibit is important to share because Harryhausen’s films helped make me the movie fan I am today. Without them, I wouldn’t be writing a Monsters and Matinees column. He also inspired some of the greatest talents in film such as Steven Spielberg, Peter Jackson, Tim Burton and Guillermo del Toro. And as George Lucas once famously said, “Without Ray Harryhausen, there would likely have been no Star Wars.”

Ray Harryhausen is pictured on set with a model of the Kraken from “Clash of the Titans,” c. 1980. (© The Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation)

Before we explore more, a bit of background first. The in-person exhibit, Ray Harryhausen: Titan of Cinema, at the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art (Modern Two) in Edinburgh, Scotland, is a collaboration with the Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation. It was originally planned to open in May 2020 as part of the foundation’s celebration of his centenary, which would have been June 29, 2020. Like most everything in 2020, it was delayed by the pandemic, but finally opened in October and now has an extended run to Feb. 20, 2022.

It’s called the “largest and most comprehensive exhibition ever” of Harryhausen and his work, yet it shows just a fraction of his mementos.  (More on that lower in the story.)

So what is it like?

THE EXPERIENCE

Our virtual experience is broken into the same five thematic rooms as the in-person exhibit.

King Kong and the Early Years: Seeing King Kong when he was 13 put Harryhausen on his lifelong path. This segment includes very early drawings and marionettes inspired by the film, some of his Kong movie memorabilia and work by his mentor Willis O’Brien. A highlight is young Harryhausen’s diary from 1939 turned to May 21 where he wrote he had already seen Kong 31 times.

Imagination to Life:An exploration of Harryhausen’s creative process from idea to reality including his development of model-making techniques.

Dynamation:An explanation of Harryhausen’s famed technique of mixing animation and live action as his career transitioned from animation to feature films. This segment includes a look at eight Dynamation movies including The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms (1953), It Came from Beneath the Sea (1955) and One Million Years B.C. (1966).

Creatures of Legend: Harryhausen moved from creature features to mythology and other stories in his later movies including the Sinbad trilogy plus Jason and the Argonauts (1963) and Clash of the Titans (1981). This segment looks at those movies. Actresses Caroline Munro and Martine Beswick are among those sharing stories.

A Life in Objects:Personal remembrances of Harryhausen from his daughter, Vanessa.

The hideously gorgeous Medusa model by Ray Harryhausen for “Clash of the Titans,” c. 1979, is part of the Titan of Cinema exhibit. (©The Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation/photo by Sam Drake, National Galleries of Scotland)

Each section starts with a video (usually 5 to 8 minutes) exploring how its theme relates to Harryhausen with guests like animator Barry Purves and Oscar-winning special effects artist Randy Cook. It also has text, images from the exhibit, sketches, storyboards and photos of Harryhausen’s creations.

Additional one-minute videos are sprinkled throughout with clips of dailies, tests and excerpts from his early filmmaking such as Cave Bear (1935) and Evolution of the World (1938). Snippets from his colorful Mother Goose Fairy Tales are especially charming and worth repeated viewings. (He called them his “teething rings.”)

Take it at your own pace in the same way you might look through a coffee table book or photo album: You can quickly scan and flip through material or dive into the details. (Big tip: Click on any photo and another screen pops up with more information.) Your virtual ticket allows you to spend all the time you want exploring as it allows you access as often as you want through Feb. 20, 2020.

Titan of Cinema is not only entertaining, it’s educational. There’s video of the first examples of stop-motion including Princess Nicotine (1909) by J. Stuart Blackton (Vitagraph Studios) and The Camerman’s Revenge (1912) by Ladislas Starevich.

Over a few days, I kept rewinding videos, enlarging photos of sketches and storyboards to look at Harryhausen’s intense detailing, and studying the models and creatures that we’re shown from the in-person exhibit. I thought I knew about Dynamation, for example, but I went back over that segment a few times to learn more.

Original skeleton models from “Jason and the Argonauts,” c. 1962. Notice the details on the shields: one has Medusa’s head, the other an octopus. (©The Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation/photo by Sam Drake, National Galleries of Scotland)

You’ll see glimpses of the in-person exhibit in videos and this is another spot I was constantly hitting pause to see as much as I could. Look carefully and you can see the setup where visitors “interact” with skeletons and other Harryhausen characters. (There are two clear partitions you stand between as the movie scene is played on the wall.)

In one room, a video plays on a large screen with sketches and photographs hanging nearby. On another wall, shelves are lined with character “replacement heads” used to convey emotion in stop-motion animation. Tables hold clear cases that cover some of his prized original creations. One has the “giant” bee, crab and octopus from Mysterious Island. Seeing them in the original size Harryhausen worked with is a reminder of how truly magical it was for him to bring them to giant-sized  life on screen.

Sketches provide a look into his inspirations and creative process. There’s a drawing for the Pteranondon from an unrealized RKO project O’Brien worked on before Kong. Although it was never finished, it provided O’Brien skills and techniques he would use in Kong. That in turn influenced Harryhausen, as seen in a pencil and charcoal Pteranodon sequence for One Million Years B.C.

His original drawings for Beast from 20,000 Fathoms depict a quite evil looking creature with a beaklike mouth and pointy ears that could walk on two legs. He originally drew it as the marine dinosaur the Mosasaur, but changes in the script led Harryhausen to evolve it into a fictional Rhedosaurus.

There are plenty of key drawings, which Harryhausen used to realize his vision and show others how a scene would look in film once he added the creatures. In other words, these acted like storyboards. His key drawings for It Came From Beneath the Sea depict scenes of the octopus with his tentacles wrapped around the Golden Gate Bridge and the Clock Tower that look nearly identical to how they appeared in the film.

Under Mysterious Island, there’s a log crossing scene first done in King Kong and seen again in Peter Jackson’s 2005 remake of King Kong.

A copy resin model of the Allosaurus from “One Million Years B.C.,” (c. 1965. (© The Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation/photo by Sam Drake, National Galleries of Scotland.)

A major highlight are the models. Photos detail some of the models in the exhibit including the skeletons, the Cyclops (The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad), UFO’s (Earth vs. the Flying Saucers), and Kenny Key from a 1946 advertisement Harryhausen did.

A papier-mâché marionette he made of Kong as a teen is scrawny and kind of cute, but its quality isn’t the point – rather how Kong and Willis O’Brien inspired him.

One of the two complete Pegasus models from Clash of the Titans is beautiful even with a damaged wing. That happened during filming when glycerin was poured over it to make it look wet. It did the job – but also led to continued deterioration through the years.

There is so much more to see going back 90 years and following Harryhausen’s entire career. Still it’s only a fraction of the available material.

Where did it all come from? Harryhausen’s daughter, Vanessa, provides the answer that came from the lasting impact the Depression had on her father.

“He was a bit of a hoarder, he liked to recycle,” she says in a video. “He didn’t throw away anything. God bless he did because we have this incredible collection of all his stuff.”

Not only is it evident in his extensive collection that he kept everything he could, but we can see it in his work, too. He never let anything he created go to waste. If it didn’t make it in the project or film it was created for, it would be used at some point even if it took decades. The virtual exhibition shows multiple examples of this.

Ray Harryhausen’s daughter, Vanessa, sits with some of her father’s models that are featured in Ray Harryhausen: Titan of Cinema. (© The Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation/photo by Sam Drake, National Galleries of Scotland.)

In the Creatures of Legend room there is a photo of an oil on canvas Harryhausen did when he was only 19. It’s a bright, colorful work of an Allosaurus fighting a cowboy with a terrified horse nearby. If that immediately conjures a scene from The Valley of Gwangi, it’s for a good reason. That original painting was created by the teen Harryhausen for a project that went unrealized; 30 years later it was inspiration for Gwangi.

We also see his vision for unrealized work, mostly through pencil and charcoal drawings, and can’t help but wonder what could have been. For War of the Worlds (1949), a film he long wanted to do, Harryhausen’s design for the alien ship has tripod legs; the alien looks like an octopus with a creepy face that has some creepy human characteristics. The Jupiterian (1937) featured a six-limbed, sinister-looking alien that only exists in the drawings and in about a minute of test footage on 16mm film.

Without Harryhausen hoarding an estimated 50,000 objects – memorabilia, sketches, storyboards, models and so much more – we wouldn’t have the chance to see this treasure trove of cinematic history. It turns out that it’s a gift to his fans, too, so take advantage of the opportunity to explore it, even if it’s from a home computer 3,000 miles away from Scotland.

HOW TO SEE IT

A ticket to the virtual exhibit is 10 pounds or about $14 in U.S. currency. Once you buy a ticket to Titan of Cinema, you have access to the virtual exhibit as often as you want to Feb. 20, 2022, the day the in-person exhibit ends. Your virtual ticket also allows you to access special live interactive experiences that will be posted on the website.

To learn more about the virtual exhibit and to buy a ticket, visit this direct link.

Be sure to look at the main website for the National Galleries of Scotland, too, since there is even more information about Harryhausen.

For more about the Ray and Diana Harryhausen Foundation, visit rayharryhausen.com.

* * * *

-Toni Ruberto for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Toni’s Monsters and Matinees articles here.

Toni Ruberto, born and raised in Buffalo, N.Y., is an editor and writer at The Buffalo News. She shares her love for classic movies in her blog, Watching Forever and is a member of the Classic Movie Blog Association. Toni was the president of the former Buffalo chapter of TCM Backlot and now leads the offshoot group, Buffalo Classic Movie Buffs. She is proud to have put Buffalo and its glorious old movie palaces in the spotlight as the inaugural winner of the TCM in Your Hometown contest. You can find Toni on Twitter at @toniruberto.

Posted in Classic Movie Hub, Horror, Monsters and Matinees, Posts by Toni Ruberto | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Noir Nook: Ripped from the Headlines – The Hitch-Hiker (1953)

Noir Nook: Ripped from the Headlines – The Hitch-Hiker (1953)

The Hitch-Hiker (1953) Movie Poster
The Hitch-Hiker (1953)

Ever seen an episode of the classic TV show Perry Mason? Remember Mason’s weekly nemesis, Hamilton Burger, played by William Talman? Well, you should check out Talman’s character in the 1953 noir The Hitch-Hiker.

He ain’t no Hamilton Burger.

Co-written and directed by Ida Lupino, and produced by her production company, The Filmakers, The Hitch-Hiker tells the story of two buddies, Roy Collins and Gilbert Bowen (Edmond O’Brien and Frank Lovejoy), who set out on a relaxing (they think) fishing weekend. But like the best-laid plans of mice and men, things don’t pan out quite as our heroes intended – they make the near-fatal mistake of picking up a hitch-hiker, Emmet Myers (Talman), who just happens to be a murderous psychopath. Myers kidnaps the men, forcing them to drive him to Mexico. Along the way, Collins and Bowen find their attempts to flee are hampered by Myers’s creepy ability to literally sleep with one eye open.

This riveting feature was based on the real-life case of Billy Cook, a native of Joplin, Missouri, who killed six people during a murderous three-week spree in January 1951. Saddled with the nickname “Cockeyed” because of a congenital eye defect, Cook endured a tragic childhood; after his mother died when he was five years old, his father abandoned the boy and his seven siblings in an old local mine. Eventually, foster homes were found for all of the children – all except Billy, whose deformed eye and incorrigible demeanor made him difficult to place. He wound up a ward of the state of Missouri and, later, after a series of petty crimes, an inmate in the Missouri State Penitentiary. During his late teens, he got a tattoo across the fingers of his left hand that spelled out “HARD LUCK.” Upon his release from prison in 1950, he was briefly reunited with his father, telling him that he was determined to “live by the gun and roam.”

William Talman as hitchhiker Emmet Myers in The Hitch-Hiker (1953)
William Talman as hitchhiker Emmet Myers in The Hitch-Hiker (1953)

Later that year, Cook put his “gun and roam” strategy into effect, hitchhiking his way first to California, then to Texas where, in December 1950, an auto mechanic offered him a ride. Cook forced the man into the trunk of his car at gunpoint but, luckily for the mechanic, he managed to escape. Serendipity wouldn’t be with Cook’s next victims. In Oklahoma, Cook was picked up by Carl Mosser, a farmer from Illinois who was traveling with his wife, their three young children, and their dog. After a terrifying three-day ordeal, Cook murdered the entire family (including the dog).

Edmond O'Brien, Frank Lovejoy and William Talman in The Hitch-Hiker (1953)
Edmond O’Brien, Frank Lovejoy and William Talman in The Hitch-Hiker (1953)

Heading west again, Cook took a deputy sheriff hostage outside Blythe, California, but he spared the man’s life. (Some reports say that Cook used to work with the sheriff’s wife and that she “had been nicer than anyone had ever been to him in his life.”) Robert Dewey, a salesman from Seattle, met a less favorable fate; after killing Dewey, Cook took his car, abandoning it in Mexicali, Mexico. By now, law enforcement agencies throughout the Southwest United States were hot on Cook’s trail, but he wasn’t finished yet. Hitching to California, he was picked up by two men on a hunting trip, James Burke and Forrest Damron. Cook kidnapped the duo, holding them hostage for the next eight days and forcing them to head for Mexico. The two men would later say that they were afraid to try to escape because Cook’s right eye always remained open and they never could tell whether their captor was awake or asleep.

After the men had driven across the Mexico border to Santa Rosalia, Cook was recognized by the police chief Luis Parra, who simply walked up to Cook, removed his gun from his belt, and arrested him. Cook was later handed over to the FBI; at the time of his arrest, he reportedly declared, “I hate everybody’s guts, and everybody hates mine.

Billy Cook murderer arrest
The arrest of real-life murderer, Billy Cook

After a trial in Oklahoma, Cook was sentenced to 300 years in prison for the murder of the Mosser family and was then convicted and sentenced to death in California for the murder of Robert Dewey. In December 1952, almost two years after the start of his killing spree, Cook was executed in the gas chamber at San Quentin prison.

Ida Lupino interviewed the two hunters who were Cook’s final captives, and she visited Cook in San Quentin shortly before his execution to secure his release to use parts of his life in her film. “I was afraid of him,” Lupino said later. “I could not wait to get the hell out of San Quentin.” Her film, co-written with her ex-husband and business partner Collier Young, was released in March 1953, just a few months after Cook’s execution. Because of the Motion Picture Production Code, which governed the depiction of sex and crime in the movies, Lupino decreased the number of Cook’s on-screen killings. The Code also prevented her from using Cook’s real name in the film, but she did exercise some creative liberties with the capture of the film’s villain, spicing up the real-life, undramatic arrest with two fistfights and a shootout.

If you’ve never seen this ripped-from-the-headlines gem, do yourself a favor and check it out. Selected for the National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being “culturally, historically or aesthetically” significant, it’s available on YouTube and Prime Video, as well as on DVD as part of the Ida Lupino: Filmmaker Collection by Kino Lorber. And if you’re already familiar with this feature, give it a re-watch.

You only owe it to yourself.

– Karen Burroughs Hannsberry for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Karen’s Noir Nook articles here.

Karen Burroughs Hannsberry is the author of the Shadows and Satin blog, which focuses on movies and performers from the film noir and pre-Code eras, and the editor-in-chief of The Dark Pages, a bimonthly newsletter devoted to all things film noir. Karen is also the author of two books on film noir – Femme Noir: The Bad Girls of Film and Bad Boys: The Actors of Film Noir. You can follow Karen on Twitter at @TheDarkPages.

If you’re interested in learning more about Karen’s books, you can read more about them on amazon here:

Posted in Noir Nook, Posts by Karen Burroughs Hannsberry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Classic Movie Travels: Joan McCracken

Classic Movie Travels: Joan McCracken

Joan McCracken Headshot
Joan McCracken

While the name Joan McCracken may not be familiar to many these days, in her heyday, she was a renowned actor, dancer, and comedian, notable for originating the role of Sylvie in Oklahoma!, taking on the nickname of “The Girl Who Falls Down” for her pratfalls in the show. An instant success and trendsetter in comedy and dance, her career and life were tragically cut short due to diabetes.

Joan Hume McCracken was born on December 31, 1917, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to sports reporter Franklin T. McCracken and Mary McCracken. Her father wrote for the Philadelphia Public Ledger, focusing on golf and boxing coverage.

A promising acrobat, McCracken was awarded a scholarship for her talents and studied dance under ballerina, choreographer, and artistic director Catherine Littlefield. McCracken would attend high school at West Philadelphia High School, though would drop out during her 10th-grade year to study dance under choreographer George Balanchine at the opening of the School of American Ballet in 1934.

Joan as Sylvie "the girl who fell down", in Oklahoma! (1943)
Joan as Sylvie “the girl who fell down”, in Oklahoma! (1943)

In the following year, she returned to Philadelphia to join the Littlefield Ballet, which would become the Philadelphia Ballet. She secured a role as a principal soloist and garnered praise when the company embarked on a European tour. Despite the challenges of being diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes, McCracken proceeded with the tour and did not adhere to her treatment regimen. Extremely private and fearing that she would lose opportunities for employment, she kept her diabetes a secret. Unfortunately, the decision to continue working made her susceptible to fainting during shows and opened the door to future medical complications.

In 1940, McCracken married dancer Jack Dunphy and the couple moved to New York, where they both found work. She danced as part of Radio City Musical’s ballet, Jacob’s Pillow (a ballet company in Massachusetts), and Eugene Loring’s Dance Players. McCracken and Dunphy later auditioned for Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Away We Go, securing anonymous dance roles in the show. As work on the show progressed, the name of the musical was changed to Oklahoma!, in which McCracken was crafting a more noticeable personality for her given role of Sylvie. Due to the pratfalls, her character made in the “Many a New Day” dance sequence, McCracken was dubbed “The Girl Who Falls Down.”

Jack Coffey and Joan McCracken in Hollywood Canteen (1944)
Jack Coffey and Joan McCracken in Hollywood Canteen (1944)

McCracken’s work in Oklahoma! led to her signing a contract with Warner Brothers, appearing in Hollywood Canteen (1944). Though initially excited to be working in films, she felt that Hollywood Canteen was patronizing and did not reflect well upon her husband and brother who were serving in the military. She also felt a lack of guidance in terms of choreography from choreographer LeRoy Prinz. As a result, she broke her contract and returned to Broadway to appear in Bloomer Girl, considered to be the first Broadway musical about feminism. In addition to receiving praise for her dancing in the show, she also cultivated a comic persona.

June Allyson, Peter Lawford, Patricia Marshall, Ray Mcdonald and Joan McCracken in Good News (1947)
June Allyson, Peter Lawford, Patricia Marshall, Ray Mcdonald and Joan McCracken in Good News (1947)

Following the success of Bloomer Girl, she starred in Billion Dollar Baby on Broadway in 1945 to positive reviews of her performance but lukewarm comments about the show. Returning to films, McCracken was hired by MGM to appear in Good News (1947) as Babe Doolittle. Though her dance numbers were enthusiastic, MGM did not renew her contract, with executives feeling she lacked “close-up appeal” and performed more in the style of a Broadway actor versus the understated style of a film actor. Additionally, her vocal range was limited, therefore preventing her from attaining many starring musical roles.

Wishing to advance as a dramatic actress, she began to study acting with Group Theatre alumnus Bobby Lewis, who would co-found the Actors Studio with Elia Kazan and Cheryl Crawford. The school was by invitation only, with McCracken securing a place as one of the Studio’s charter members. Her dramatic role in Galileo opened the door to many more serious and non-dancing roles. McCracken also appeared on television in the role of Essie in You Can’t Take it With You (1950).

McCracken and Dunphy divorced in 1951, with Dunphy going on to be Truman Capote’s partner until Capote’s passing. In relation to Capote and his work, McCracken was actually one of the real-life counterparts of Holly Golightly in his novella, Breakfast at Tiffany’s. Golightly’s reaction to the death of her brother in the Army overseas mirrors McCracken’s violent reaction to the death of her brother. Additionally, Golightly is depicted singing songs from Oklahoma! while playing the guitar.

In the meantime, McCracken met choreographer and dancer Bob Fosse while working in Dance Me a Song in a starring role. They were married from 1952 to 1959, with McCracken working to advance his career and support his work. Her influence with producer George Abbott led to Fosse’s first major role as choreographer for The Pajama Game. As her health worsened, Fosse left McCracken for Gwen Verdon.

McCracken would go on to succeed Jean Arthur in a touring company production of Peter Pan as well as appear on the sitcom Claudia: The Story of a Marriage. She also appeared on Broadway in Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Me and Juliet.

McCracken’s decline in health hindered her career, as her dance abilities were impacted. She suffered from a heart attack in 1955 in addition to various health problems and extended hospital stays. Complications from diabetes made it difficult for her to work. Her last stage appearance was in the off-Broadway production of The Infernal Machine in 1958.

McCracken’s final relationship was with actor Marc Adams. She spent her final years at a beach house in The Pines on Fire Island, New York, dying in her sleep from a heart attack on November 1, 1961. She was cremated and her ashes were given to her mother, though they were later lost.

Today, there are some tributes to McCracken. The Girl Who Fell Down: A Biography of Joan McCracken by Lisa Jo Sagolla offers an intimate portrait of McCracken and her life.

"The Girl Who Fell Down" by Lisa Jo Sagolla Book Joan McCracken
“The Girl Who Fell Down” by Lisa Jo Sagolla

While McCracken herself does not appear in this clip, her Sylvie character is spotted as the dancer who falls down in this sequence from Oklahoma!

In 1920, McCracken and her parents, as well as her maternal grandmother, resided at 920 Farragut Terrace in Philadelphia. The family also took in a boarder who was a fellow newspaper reporter. This is what it looks like today:

Joan McCracken 920 Farragut Terrace, Philadelphia, PA
920 Farragut Terrace, Philadelphia, PA

By 1930, the family relocated to 616 S. 54th St in Philadelphia, along with the addition of McCracken’s little brother, Frank. This is the home today:

Joan McCracken 616 S. 54th St., Philadelphia, PA
616 S. 54th St., Philadelphia, PA

Though few recordings of McCracken exist, we are lucky to have some of her performances captured in films.

–Annette Bochenek for Classic Movie Hub

Annette Bochenek pens our monthly Classic Movie Travels column. You can read all of Annette’s Classic Movie Travel articles here.

Annette Bochenek of Chicago, Illinois, is a PhD student at Dominican University and an independent scholar of Hollywood’s Golden Age. She manages the Hometowns to Hollywood blog, in which she writes about her trips exploring the legacies and hometowns of Golden Age stars. Annette also hosts the “Hometowns to Hollywood” film series throughout the Chicago area. She has been featured on Turner Classic Movies and is the president of TCM Backlot’s Chicago chapter. In addition to writing for Classic Movie Hub, she also writes for Silent Film Quarterly, Nostalgia Digest, and Chicago Art Deco SocietyMagazine.

Posted in Classic Movie Travels, Posts by Karen Burroughs Hannsberry | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Vitagraph: America’s First Great Motion Picture Studio – Book Giveaway (June)

“Vitagraph: America’s First Great Motion Picture Studio
We have Four Books to Giveaway this Month!

CMH is happy to announce our next Classic Movie Book Giveaway as part of our partnership with University Press of Kentucky! This time, we’ll be giving away FOUR COPIES of “Vitagraph: America’s First Great Motion Picture Studio” in celebration of the book’s release on June 9th!

And — stay tuned right here on the CMH blog, because in a few days we’ll be announcing our next Screen Classics Discussion Video Series Event with University Press of Kentucky and co-host Aurora from Once Upon a Screen, in which Vitagraph author Andrew Erish will be discussing the book! It will be a live Facebook Chat, so you’ll be able to comment and ask questions!

In the meantime, please don’t forget to check out our other author discussions in the series, embedded for your convenience way down near the bottom of this post: “Jane Russell and the Marketing of a Hollywood Legend” and “Growing Up Hollywood”.

…..

Vitagraph America's First Great Motion Picture Studio

…..

In order to qualify to win this book via this contest giveaway, you must complete the below entry task by Saturday, July 3 at 6PM EST. Winners will be chosen via random drawings.

We will announce our four lucky winners on Twitter @ClassicMovieHub on Sunday, July 4, around 9PM EST. And, please note that you don’t have to have a Twitter account to enter; just see below for the details.

To recap, there will be FOUR WINNERS, chosen by random, all to be announced on July 4th.

vitagraph studios aerial view
Aerial view of Vitagraph’s Brooklyn studios, ca 1915. Motion Picture News, August 19, 1922. (courtesy University Press of Kentucky)

…..

And now on to the contest!

ENTRY TASK (2-parts) to be completed by Saturday, July 3, 2021 at 6PM EST

1) Answer the below question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog post

2) Then TWEET (not DM) the following message*:
Just entered to win the “Vitagraph: America’s First Great Motion Picture Studio” #BookGiveaway courtesy of @KentuckyPress & @ClassicMovieHub – #EnterToWin http://www.classicmoviehub.com/blog/vitagraph-americas-first-great-motion-picture-studio-book-giveaway-june/

THE QUESTION:
What intrigues you about Vitagraph and/or its history. And, if you’re unfamiliar with this historic studio, why would you like to win this book?

*If you do not have a Twitter account, you can still enter the contest by simply answering the above question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog — BUT PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU ADD THIS VERBIAGE TO YOUR ANSWER: I do not have a Twitter account, so I am posting here to enter but cannot tweet the message.

NOTE: if for any reason you encounter a problem commenting here on this blog, please feel free to tweet or DM us, or send an email to clas@gmail.com and we will be happy to create the entry for you.

ALSO: Please allow us 48 hours to approve your comments. Sorry about that, but we are being overwhelmed with spam, and must sort through 100s of comments…

vitagraph theater 1914
Vitagraph Theatre, February 1914. Motion Picture Magazine, April 1914. (courtesy of University Press of Kentucky

…..

If you missed our other chats in the Screen Classics Discussion Series, you can catch them on Facebook and YouTube:

…..

About the Book:  Andrew A. Erish provides the first comprehensive examination and reassessment of the company most responsible for defining and popularizing the American movie. This history challenges long-accepted Hollywood mythology that simply isn’t true: that Paramount and Fox invented the feature film, that Universal created the star system, and that these companies, along with MGM and Warner Bros., developed motion pictures into a multi-million-dollar business. In fact, the truth about Vitagraph is far more interesting than the myths that later moguls propagated about themselves. Established in 1897 by J. Stuart Blackton and Albert E. Smith, Vitagraph was the leading producer of motion pictures for much of the silent era. Vitagraph established America’s studio system, a division of labor utilizing specialized craftspeople and artists, including a surprising number of women and minorities, whose aesthetic innovations have long been incorporated into virtually all commercial cinema. They developed fundamental aspects of the form and content of American movies, encompassing everything from framing, lighting, and performance style to emphasizing character-driven comedy and drama in stories that respected and sometimes poked fun at every demographic of Vitagraph’s vast audience. The company overcame resistance to multi-reel motion pictures by establishing a national distribution network for its feature films. Vitagraph’s international distribution was even more successful, cultivating a worldwide preference for American movies that endures to the present. For most of its existence America’s most influential studio was headquartered in Brooklyn, New York before relocating to Hollywood. Finally, here is a historically rigorous and thorough account of the most influential producer of American motion pictures during the silent era. Drawing on valuable primary material long overlooked by other historians, Erish introduces readers to the fascinating, forgotten pioneers of Vitagraph.

Click here for the full contest rules. 

Please note that only United States (excluding the territory of Puerto Rico) and Canada entrants are eligible.

Good Luck!

And if you can’t wait to win the book, you can purchase them on amazon by clicking below:

 …..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Books, Contests & Giveaways, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged , , , | 30 Comments

Western RoundUp: Corriganville

Western RoundUp: Corriganville

Some of the best-known Western movie locations are beyond Southern California… places like Lone Pine’s Alabama Hills, further north in California, or Monument Valley, where John Ford shot Westerns on the Arizona-Utah border.

However, hundreds of Westerns, typically those with lower budgets, were filmed at Southern California “movie ranches.”  Some of these ranches were owned by the studios, serving as an additional “backlot,” while other ranches, such as Iverson or Jauregui, were independently owned entities that made money allowing studios to film on a film-by-film basis.

Corriganville Ranch in Simi Valley, California

One of the best-known Southern California movie ranches was Corriganville in Simi Valley.  The ranch was owned by actor Ray “Crash” Corrigan, who purchased the land in 1937.  

Corrigan was known for playing Tucson Smith in Republic’s Three Mesquiteers Western movie series alongside John Wayne and others; later he appeared in Monogram’s Range Busters films, where his character went by his offscreen nickname, Crash Corrigan.

Ray "Crash" Corrigan Headshot
Ray “Crash” Corrigan

Corriganville was not only a busy movie ranch, it was also a theme park from the years 1949 to 1965, when Corrigan sold the property to Bob Hope.  It was something of a forerunner to Universal Studios in Universal City, which opened to the public in 1964, just as Corriganville was close to winding down operations.  It also had some similarities to the Knott’s Berry Farm Ghost Town in Buena Park.

During its years as a Western movie attraction, visitors could tour the fort built for John Ford’s Fort Apache (1948), explore Western town sets, watch stuntman shows, enjoy live music, and more.

Corriganville Movie Ranch Attraction Map
Corriganville Movie Ranch Attraction Map

Major brush fires swept through the property in the ’70s, destroying the buildings; all that remains of Corriganville today are concrete slabs, stonework, and a lake used for filming water scenes.  The property was bought by the City of Simi Valley in 1988 and is now a regional park open to the public, with multiple hiking trails and picnic areas.

Corriganville Movie Ranch Park Entrance Sign
Corriganville Movie Ranch Park Entrance Sign

I recently visited Corriganville for the first time and found it quite interesting.  As I share some photos from my visit I’ll also discuss a few of the movies filmed when Corriganville was in its heyday.

Set for Fort Apache (1948) Corriganville Ranch
Set for Fort Apache (1948)

Above is a photo of the Fort Apache set, which was later reused in Ambush (1950) and many other films and TV series.  If you look at my photo below, the rocks in the background exactly line up with those seen behind the fort set.  It was quite exciting to know that I was standing where John Wayne, Henry Fonda, George O’Brien, and Ward Bond once walked.

Corriganville Ranch Film location for Fort Apache (1948)
Film location for Fort Apache (1948)

Here’s more scenery from the general area where Fort Apache filmed:

Corriganville Ranch Another location for the filming of Fort Apache (1948)
Another location for the filming of Fort Apache (1948)

One of the most interesting things at Corriganville is the remains of a small “lake” where movies including Columbia Pictures’ Jungle Jim series were once filmed.  

Corriganville Ranch Pool used for the Jungle Jim series
Pool used for the Jungle Jim series sometimes called “Robin Hood Lake,” “Sherwood Lake,” or “Jungle Jim Lake”

The lake is sometimes known as “Robin Hood Lake,” “Sherwood Lake,” or “Jungle Jim Lake.”  A room with thick windows allowed for underwater photography; the building remains but the glass from the windows is gone.

Corriganville Ranch Pool with camera windows
Camera windows used for underwater filming

A door could be slid down into place to dam the lake and raise the water level as needed:

Corriganville Ranch "Sherwood Lake" dam used to hold water levels
“Sherwood Lake” dam used to hold water levels

Another look from a different angle.  Some sources indicate that scenes for The African Queen (1951) and Creature From the Black Lagoon (1954) were among the films which shot here; if that information is accurate, my best guess is that they were brief insert shots needed to supplement the extensive location filming which took place out of state.

Corriganville Ranch "lake" used for films such as The African Queen (1951) and Creature From the Black Lagoon (1954)
Corriganville Ranch “lake” used for films such as The African Queen (1951) and Creature From the Black Lagoon (1954)

This view looks across the lake to “Stunt Rock,” from which Jungle Jim (Johnny Weissmuller) would dive into the water:

Corriganville Ranch Robin Hood Lake sign
Robin Hood Lake sign

At the end of the lake was the Susana Pass Bridge, seen in The Three Musketeers (1948), The Swordsman (1948), and the Roy Rogers Westerns Susanna Pass (1949) and Twilight in the Sierras (1950).

Corriganville Ranch "Susanna Pass Bridge" sign
“Susana Pass Bridge”

Trail Blazer Cave was a man-made cave located here; it’s named for its appearance in Arizona Whirlwind (1944), part of the Trail Blazers movie series which starred Hoot Gibson, Ken Maynard, and Bob Steele.  The cave also appeared in Corrigan’s own The Range Busters (1940) and later in Billy the Kid vs. Dracula (1966) with John Carradine.  The Fugitive TV series starring David Janssen also filmed here.

Corriganville Ranch Trail Blazer Cave sign
Trail Blazer Cave

Today visitors can still see concrete slabs where Western town buildings once stood.  In the distance is stonework from a one-time horse barn.

Corriganville Ranch location where buildings and stables once stood before a fire in the '70s
A location where buildings and stables once stood before a fire in the ’70s

A closer look at the old barn site. Snowfire (1958) with Don Megowan was one of the Westerns filmed here.

Corriganville Ranch stables used in films like Snowfire (1958)
What’s left of stables used in films like Snowfire (1958)

Another area where what’s left of set construction has been overgrown in the decades since the last fire:

Corriganville Ranch Overgrown remains of what's left of the ranch locations after the fire
Overgrown remains of what’s left of the ranch locations after the fire

Western TV series filmed at Corriganville in its heyday included The Adventures of Rin Tin Tin, Sky King, and The Lone Ranger.

Today Corriganville is a Ventura County Historical Landmark which is open to the public free of charge, and visitors can walk the trails where cowboy heroes once rode.

Corriganville Ranch Park Map

For those considering a visit to Corriganville Park, it is open from dawn to dusk.  There is free parking, with portable bathroom facilities provided next to the parking lot.  Picnic tables are provided in multiple areas.  Leashed dogs are allowed.  I spent just under three hours walking multiple trails and pausing to take pictures; most of the ground is fairly flat but the Fort Apache area is hilly.

— Laura Grieve for Classic Movie Hub

Laura can be found at her blog, Laura’s Miscellaneous Musings, where she’s been writing about movies since 2005, and on Twitter at @LaurasMiscMovie. A lifelong film fan, Laura loves the classics including Disney, Film Noir, Musicals, and Westerns.  She regularly covers Southern California classic film festivals.  Laura will scribe on all things western at the ‘Western RoundUp’ for CMH.

Posted in Posts by Laura Grieve, Western RoundUp | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 16 Comments

Screen Classics Discussion Video Series: Jane Russell and the Marketing of a Hollywood Legend with Author Christina Rice

“Mean…Moody…Magnificent
Jane Russell and the Marketing of a Hollywood Legend.”
Facebook Live Chat with author Christina Rice

I’m so happy to announce that we’ll be hosting our next Facebook Event for the Screen Classics Discussion Video Series, with University Press of Kentucky and co-host Aurora from Once Upon a Screen! This time it will be a Live Chat, so you’ll be able comment and ask questions as well!

Join us, as Vitagraph author Andrew Erish chats with author Christina Rice about her new book “Mean…Moody…Magnificent – Jane Russell and the Marketing of a Hollywood Legend.” Should be a fun and interesting conversation!

You can tune in Sunday, May 30 at 9pm ET on the Classic Movie Hub Facebook Page.

Jane Russell and the Marketing of a Hollywood Legend Facebook Live Chat with author Christina Rice

…..

And, don’t forget to enter our ‘Mean…Moody…Magnificent” book giveaway! We’ll be giving away FOUR copies of the book! Enter here by Saturday, June 5 at 6PM EST for your chance to win!

…..

If you missed our last event, you can check it out on YouTube. It was called “Growing Up Hollywood” in which author Alan Rode chatted with two children of Hollywood legends (understatement) — Victoria Riskin and William Wellman Jr. Here is it is, in all its glory… 🙂

…..

Stay tuned for more in this Discussion Series — which will include conversations about Vitagraph, Jayne Mansfield, Charles Boyer and more!

…..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Books, Interviews, Posts by Annmarie Gatti, Screen Classics Discussion Video Series | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Western RoundUp: Hidden Gems, Vol. 3

Western RoundUp: Hidden Gems, Vol. 3

It’s time for another look at some Western “Hidden Gems”!

These are relatively lesser-known yet entertaining movies that deserve a look from fans of the Western genre. I’ve found both of these films, which share a cavalry theme, worth multiple watches. Happily, they’re both available on DVD.

Ambush (Sam Wood, 1949)

Ambush is a very good yet rather overlooked Robert Taylor Western. Taylor made better-known Westerns at his longtime studio, MGM, including the highly regarded Devil’s Doorway (1950) and Westward the Women (1951), but I also find Ambush to be quite enjoyable.

The screenplay by Marguerite Roberts is based on a novel by Luke Short, whose writing inspired a number of excellent movie Westerns. Indeed, three of the four titles in my column on “Noir-Tinged Westerns” were based on works by Short.

Arlene Dahl and John Hodiak in Ambush (1949)
Arlene Dahl and John Hodiak in Ambush (1949)

Taylor, an avid outdoorsman off the screen, is completely at home as Ward Kinsman, a civilian Cavalry scout in Arizona Territory. He’s asked by the fort commandant (Leon Ames) to rescue a woman kidnapped by an Indian tribe headed by Diablito (Charles Stevens).

Kinsman is dubious about pulling off a successful rescue mission but encouraged to move forward due to his attraction to the missing woman’s beautiful sister, Ann (Arlene Dahl). Ann is being romanced by Capt. Ben Lorrison (John Hodiak) but is clearly more interested in Kinsman.

Robert Taylor and Alrene Dahl in Ambush (1949)
Robert Taylor and Alrene Dahl in Ambush (1949)

As with so many Westerns, this Cavalry film has familiar themes, but it’s the unique spins of the filmmakers which give it interest, and in this case, it’s a very polished production.

Viewer attention is captured from the opening seconds, with Indian drums beating while Leo the Lion roars in the traditional MGM opening. That’s followed by complete silence as we’re shown the tragic aftermath of an Indian attack; we next see Indians riding away as the movie title zooms onto the screen. It’s an exciting and highly effective way to begin the movie.

Another plus is that the film has extensive location work in Arizona and New Mexico, filmed in black and white by Harold Lipstein; additional scenes were filmed at Southern California’s Corriganville movie ranch. There are moments that are clearly back projections cut into location scenes, but all in all, it’s a very good-looking movie.

Robert Taylor in Ambush (1949)
Robert Taylor in Ambush (1949)

Taylor is tops as the rugged Kinsman, and John McIntire also deserves particular notice as a grizzled scout. McIntire was a real chameleon; it’s almost hard to believe the bearded, tough scout seen here is played by the same actor who was the quiet, elderly detective with vision problems in the previous year’s Scene of the Crime (1949).

I like Hodiak a great deal although his character here is admittedly mostly an annoying foil for Robert Taylor. Don Taylor and Jean Hagen add interest in a rather unusual subplot about an officer in love with a married, abused wife.

Available on DVD from the Warner Archive.

Escort West (Francis D. Lyon, 1958)

John Wayne‘s Batjac Productions produced a few films which didn’t star Wayne. The best — and best-known — of the non-Wayne Batjac films is Seven Men From Now (1956), starring Randolph Scott and directed by Budd Boetticher.

Escort West is another non-Wayne Batjac Production, released via United Artists, starring Victor Mature. Mature’s Romina Productions co-produced the film.

Victor Mature in Escort West (1958)
Victor Mature in Escort West (1958)

While Escort West isn’t a classic on the level of Seven Men From Now, it’s one of those “darn good Westerns” I so enjoy. It’s a relatively low-budget film, shot on Southern California locations, but it provides a solidly entertaining, fast-paced 75 minutes.

Mature is very likable as Ben Lassiter, a widowed Confederate veteran headed to Oregon Territory with his young daughter Abbey (Reba Waters) in 1865.

In Nevada, Ben rescues sisters Beth (Elaine Stewart) and Martha (Faith Domergue), along with an elderly black man, Nelson (Rex Ingram), who are all survivors of a wagon train ambush.

The film utilizes the classic Western theme of travelers banding together against dangerous outside forces, in this case, both Indians and renegade soldiers.

Victor Mature, Faith Domergue, Elaine Stewart, and Reba Waters in Escort West (1958)
Victor Mature, Faith Domergue, Elaine Stewart, and Reba Waters in Escort West (1958)

Actor Leo Gordon, who plays a Cavalry trooper who is one of the villains, co-wrote the script with Fred Hartsook. I don’t consider the fact that their storyline is familiar to be negative; to the contrary, that’s what makes this film “Western movie comfort food.”

The film has a marvelous cast of familiar faces, with Ken Curtis of TV’s Gunsmoke joining Gordon as a villain; Harry Carey Jr. and Noah Beery Jr. are Cavalry soldiers on the side of the good guys.

Domergue, who was memorable as the villainess in the Audie Murphy Western The Duel at Silver Creek (1952), plays an emotionally disturbed woman, which seems to have been something of a specialty for the actress; she was especially memorable in 1951’s Where Danger Lives with Robert Mitchum.

Stewart, who would appear in Murphy and James Stewart‘s Night Passage (1957) a few years later, is appealing as the calmer, more dependable sister – though viewers should be forewarned she has noticeably odd, inconsistent eyebrow makeup. (What were they thinking?)

Victor Mature and Rex Ingram in Escort West (1958)
Victor Mature and Rex Ingram in Escort West (1958)

Rex Ingram is excellent in his scenes, lending the film considerable gravitas, and Waters is good as Mature’s brave young daughter. The supporting cast is rounded out by Slim Pickens, Roy Barcroft, William Ching, and John Hubbard.

Although the locations are familiar from dozens of low-budget Westerns, the movie is helped by the fact that numerous scenes were filmed outdoors; the movie also does a better than average job mixing in soundstage “exteriors.”  The black and white CinemaScope cinematography was by William H. Clothier, who filmed Seven Men From Now and many other fine films, including Dragoon Wells Massacre (1957), which I recommended in my last column on Hidden Gems.

In short, Escort West is an ordinary Western elevated by top filmmaking talent, providing viewers with a very enjoyable experience.

Escort West is available on DVD from MGM.

For previous “Hidden Gems” recommendations, please visit Volume 1, posted here in January 2020, and Volume 2 from November 2020.

— Laura Grieve for Classic Movie Hub

Laura can be found at her blog, Laura’s Miscellaneous Musings, where she’s been writing about movies since 2005, and on Twitter at @LaurasMiscMovie. A lifelong film fan, Laura loves the classics including Disney, Film Noir, Musicals, and Westerns.  She regularly covers Southern California classic film festivals.  Laura will scribe on all things western at the ‘Western RoundUp’ for CMH.

Posted in Posts by Laura Grieve, Western RoundUp | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Lives Behind the Legends: Marilyn Monroe

Marilyn Monroe – The Intellectual

marilyn monroe reading a book

Over the years, Marilyn Monroe has become more icon than person. The Marilyn the world knows is mostly defined by two things: appearance and tragedy. She is seen as the ditzy, blonde bombshell who giggles as her skirt flies up or as the naïve orphan eaten alive by Hollywood. In reality, Marilyn Monroe was anything but ditzy or naïve. She had over 430 books when she passed away; many of them bore her personal notes in the margins. Her favorite book was Ulysses by James Joyce and one of her dreams was to get The Brothers Karamazov by Dostoevsky made on screen with herself playing Grushenka. She continued self-educating her whole life and she even started her own production company. These facts are often lost in the myth, but behind the blonde bombshell persona was an intelligent woman whose intellectual side was an important part of her life.

Most people are aware that Marilyn Monroe’s childhood was anything but idyllic. So it comes as no surprise that Marilyn’s education was chaotic due to her unpredictable home life. Going from foster home, to her mother, to friends, to an orphanage, to her mother’s best friend meant that she changed schools at the drop of a hat. She struggled most with public speaking, as her traumatic upbringing had left her with an occasional stutter. Nonetheless, she showed a real flair for writing and contributed to the school paper. But after a few stable years in the same school, her education was cut short when she married at the age of sixteen. In those days, getting married meant that you became a full-time housewife, so Marilyn left school for good. Her lack of a diploma was a sore spot her entire life. Marilyn later admitted that she was bored out of her mind as a housewife. So it seemed like fate when she was discovered by a photographer while her husband was away for his work in the military.

marilyn monroe color

The idea of a career as a model, and maybe more, lit a fire in her. As a child, she had dreamed of being just like her idol Jean Harlow. The head of her modeling agency later said: ‘She wanted to learn, wanted to be somebody, more than anybody I ever saw before in my life.’ An astute observation, as Marilyn soon left the modeling industry for Hollywood and subsequently divorced the husband who wanted her to remain a housewife. Marilyn had bigger plans.

Although she quickly received a contract at 20th Century Fox, they barely took notice of her. The ambitious Marilyn showed up at the studio regularly and talked to anyone who could teach her something: from cameramen to the lighting crew, to the make-up and wardrobe department. Her lack of roles only motivated her to learn as much as she could about her new career path. She started taking lessons at the Actor’s Laboratory, a popular place among playwrights, Broadway directors, and stage actors. This was her first introduction to acting as a serious craft and Marilyn was mesmerized. She became determined to be the best actress she could be, but this clashed with her own insecurities and what other people wanted from her. Marilyn had made some valuable connections, but most of them made no secret of their attraction to her. It was made clear that her sexuality was her biggest asset on her career path. Despite the superficial world she found herself in, Marilyn remained undeterred when it came to learning and challenging herself. She had a thirst for knowledge, which was an important part of her personality, despite not being stimulated by anyone around her. During this time, Marilyn was known to read Tolstoy, Marcel Proust, and Thomas Wolfe, often calling friends with a flair for literature with questions. The Actor’s Lab had ignited her love for the stage and she became fascinated by the idea of playing Grushenka in Dostoevsky’s The Brothers Karamazov. Literature and plays were not her only interests: she was already looking into the teachings of Freud, something that would become more important later in her life. In 1950, not long before she became a star, she even enrolled in a literature night class at the University of California. But surrounding herself with teachers did not always work in her favor, especially when it came to acting. The more acting coaches told her what she did wrong, the more insecure she became. Marilyn was more of a natural in front of the camera than she gave herself credit for. Viewers noticed this quicker than the studio, as they bombarded the starlet with fan letters, despite the small roles she was playing.

marilyn monroe with letters

20th Century Fox could not deny her potential any longer and they gave her bigger parts, which led to more press. Marilyn was disappointed to find out that most articles focused on her physique, though one journalist for Collier’s did mention that he saw books by Whitman, Rilke, Tolstoy, Sandburg and Arthur Miller on her bookshelf, with bookmarkers and notes sticking out of them.

Marilyn might not have had a college education, but she did have one thing that most people at 20th Century Fox did not have: street smarts. This saved her career when nude pictures of her were discovered in 1952. The studio panicked and came up with a tried and true method in the conventional 1950’s: deny, deny, deny. Instead, Marilyn went rogue: she admitted to a journalist that it really was her in the pictures and simply said that she had needed the money to pay for food and rent. She was counting on the audience feeling empathy for her struggles and appreciation for her honesty. Her instincts proved right, her honest admission caused a wave of positive publicity and the studio exhaled a sigh of relief. By this time, Marilyn was finally playing leading roles. While working on Niagara, director Henry Hathaway called her ‘witty and bright’. While working on Gentlemen Prefer Blondes co-star Jane Russell tried to get her involved in religion. Marilyn reciprocated by giving her a book about Sigmund Freud. After she appeared on the Jack Benny Show, the comedian raved about her natural talent for comedy. Still, the people at 20th Century Fox did not take their new star seriously. An example of their view on Marilyn is the time when the publicity department arranged for poet Dame Edith Sitwell to write an article about her. The idea was that their ‘opposite’ personalities would be funny. Imagine their surprise when the pair got on extremely well and spent most of the time discussing philosopher Rudolf Steiner. Marilyn and Edith even kept in touch and dame Sitwell would later describe Marilyn as ‘quiet, with great natural dignity and extremely intelligent.’ Still, in the midst of becoming a world-renowned star, Marilyn was stuck on the same $1500 a week salary at Fox. More importantly, she was sick of the ‘dumb blonde’ roles they kept forcing on her. She knew this persona had gotten her this far, but she also knew that she was capable of much more. So she took matters into her own hands and decided to do what only a few actors had dared to do before her: she started her own production company. It took over a year for the negotiations with 20th Century Fox to succeed. But Marilyn stood her ground and became the producer of her own movies.


In the meantime, Marilyn left Hollywood for New York. This hub of intellectuals, writers, and artists had always attracted her. She openly discussed her desire to finally be herself instead of ‘Marilyn Monroe’, who had become a character she had to play. One of her first moves was to become a member of the famous Actors Studio run by Lee Strasberg – a way for her to fine-tune her craft and become the serious and respected actress she so desperately wanted to be.

marilyn monroe

Strasberg was known for championing Method Acting: an acting technique centered on actors using their past and emotions while acting. Lee gave her private lessons and encouraged her to see a psychoanalyst. From now on, Marilyn would be encouraged to relive her traumatic childhood almost daily, through Lee’s techniques and a succession of psychoanalysts with connections to Freud. This would contribute to Marilyn’s infamous downward spiral over the following years, in which she began taking a lot of prescribed medication and drinking alcohol to cope. Still, her drive for perfection made her completely devoted to Lee’s lessons and it was only after months of training that she felt good enough to perform for his other students, who burst into applause as soon as she was done. Despite her personal issues, she enjoyed the culture in New York immensely. Marilyn was known to wander around the city, going to bookstores, museums and the theatre without make-up on and in regular clothes. In the New York social scene, she found friends who encouraged these interests. At their dinner parties, she would shyly recite poetry by Yeats, which she knew by heart. Some of her new friends were famed authors such as Carson McCullers and Truman Capote. The latter would later say: ‘She was very bright. People would humor her, thinking she was a dumb blonde; but Marilyn was very perceptive. She wasn’t fooled by many people, and they thought they were fooling her all the time.’ It was around this time that she started to write her own poetry, as well as paint watercolors.


When the contract between her production company and 20th Century Fox was approved, Time Magazine called her ‘a shrewd businesswoman’. For one of the first projects she chose, The Prince and the Showgirl, she asked Laurence Olivier to co-star and direct. Olivier was a respected Shakespearean actor, a good fit for Marilyn’s desire to be taken seriously from now on. Unfortunately, Olivier began filming by telling her: ‘All you have to do is be sexy, dear Marilyn’. This did not go down well and their relationship did not recover. She would find herself in a somewhat similar situation with her third husband, playwright Arthur Miller, a few months later. He had promised to write a good role for her in his screenplay The Misfits, in which she could finally show the world her acting chops. Marilyn was devastated when she found the part of ‘Roslyn’ to be a caricature of her own personality. She felt that he had made a mockery of her, but she had already committed to doing the film. Their marriage, which was already in hot water, was over.

marilyn monroe 2

Resilient as always, Marilyn pushed on after another personal blow. Despite constantly feeling forced back into the ‘blonde bombshell’ persona, she remained focused on her quest for knowledge and growth. She became involved in politics: Marilyn was a founding member of the Hollywood branch of the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy and she was elected as an alternate delegate to Connecticut’s Democratic caucus, as she had lived in the state with Miller. She was not shy about her political views. She was vocal in her support of the civil rights movement and she wrote the editor of the New York Times about her thoughts on the candidates for the new election. A dream came true for her when she befriended writer Carl Sandburg, the biographer of her political hero Abraham Lincoln. Work was still on her mind as well. She argued with 20th Century Fox about the chaotic production of her next project Something’s Got To Give. Working with Fox had become more stressful than ever and she was contemplating her own projects again, such as a movie about her childhood icon Jean Harlow. Unfortunately, she passed away before this could come to fruition. Much has been said about Marilyn’s untimely death. Was it suicide, an accidental overdose or something more sinister? We may never know, but according to those closest to her, she remained bright, funny and eager to learn up until the end. She never saw herself as a victim. Marilyn was a shrewd businesswoman, a talented actress, a creative all-rounder and an intelligent autodidact. Maybe it’s exactly because there were so many sides to her that she has become an enigma people want to figure out. Marilyn was many things, but above all she was unique. It was through her intelligence and ambition that she created ‘Marilyn Monroe’, an icon who continues to fascinate worldwide more than fifty years after her death.

The sources for the quotes in this article are Marilyn Monroe: The Biography by Donald Spoto, Norma Jean: The Life of Marilyn Monroe by Fred Lawrence Guiles, Taken Care Of by Dame Edith Sitwell, and Truman Capote: Conversations by M. Thomas Inge; also Time articles – May 1956 and June 2016.

…..

— Arancha van der Veen for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Arancha’s Lives Behind the Legends Articles Here.

Arancha has been fascinated with Classic Hollywood and its stars for years. Her main area of expertise is the behind-the-scenes stories, though she’s pretty sure she could beat you at movie trivia night too. Her website, Classic Hollywood Central, is about everything Classic Hollywood, from actors’ life stories and movie facts to Classic Hollywood myths. You can follow her on Twitter at @ClassicHC.

Posted in Lives Behind the Legends, Posts by Arancha van der Veen | 1 Comment

Classic Conversations: Adam-Michael James Brings the Beloved ‘Bewitched’ Characters Back to Life in His New Book ‘Samantha’s Seventies’

There’s no one on the planet who knows more about the classic TV series Bewitched than talented writer Adam-Michael James. His deliciously comprehensive first book, The Bewitched Continuum, was an encyclopedic tome packed with everything you ever wanted to know about the series that ran from 1964 to 1972 including a detailed synopsis of all 254 episodes. A few years ago, James penned the novel I, Samantha, Take This Mortal, Darrin, his wished-for finale for the series (which didn’t get a proper sendoff when it was canceled in 1972). I was amazed at how perfectly James captured the voices of every character, and how his insane knowledge of every nuance of the series allowed him to create such a believable and authentic conclusion, albeit one that came with quite a few surprises. At the time, the writer thought he was finished with the characters, but Samantha (Elizabeth Montgomery), Endora (Agnes Moorehead), and the rest of the lot had other ideas.

Now Adam-Michael James is back with Samantha’s Seventies, a new novel that takes Samantha and Darrin Stephens through that tumultuous decade. Picking up where his last book left off, James explores the different ways the mortals in Samantha’s world deal with the news that she’s a witch. It’s all great fun and full of fascinating adventures such as when two Aunt Claras emerge; Samantha trains her children, Tabitha and Adam, on the proper use of witchcraft; the witches explore their troubling attitudes towards mortals during a Bicentennial celebration that expands on the show’s themes of inclusion; and young Tabitha briefly hops into her 25-year-old self in a nod to her self-titled sequel from the late 70s. And finally, a surprise couple exchanges “I do’s” in a never-before-seen witch wedding.

I was excited to talk to James by phone from his home in Canada about his expert recreation of these beloved characters. 

Danny Miller: This was such a fun book to read! At this point it seems like you know these characters so well that you’re channeling them.  

Adam-Michael James rocking his 1970s look

Adam-Michael James: Or maybe like they’re channeling me. I wasn’t planning on doing this book but it just felt like they had more to say. They sort of sat me down and said, “You know what? We know you weren’t going to write another book but this is what we need you to do.”

It’s crazy how you manage to get every voice down so perfectly. It’s really fun to hear all the actors’ voices in my head: Elizabeth Montgomery, Agnes Moorehead, Marion Lorne, Paul Lynde, Alice Ghostley, all of them so perfectly recreated. And such an interesting premise to have so many people know about Samantha being a witch. I never thought much about the complexity of the mortals’ reaction to that. 

Yeah, I had to deal with that because of the way I ended the previous book. That was really fun to explore, and there were some other ideas that I thought, “Oh, wouldn’t that be fun to do?” like the part of the book where Tabitha briefly becomes a 25-year-old which is a reference to the Tabitha TV series and then tells her mother, “I had this strange dream! I was working at a TV station and I had this yellow car, it all seemed so real.” 

The mortals’ reaction to finding out Samantha is a witch was not what I would have expected. I don’t want to give big plot points away but I’ll just say I loved Gladys Kravitz’s reaction to the news. Throughout the series, Gladys was obviously one of the biggest thorns in Samantha’s side in terms of keeping her witchcraft under wraps, so her reaction here is so fun and fulfilling.

Alice Pearce as Gladys Kravitz

I wanted to get into her motivation of why she was such a pain for so many years. If you look at Gladys’s actions throughout the series, she just wants to know that she’s not crazy since people were always telling her that. So once people find out, I thought it would be better if she was more mellow about it than some of the others.

There’s a kind of feminist throughline there. How many times in history have people told women that they were crazy because of what they said they knew? I think it’s fantastic that Gladys is the one who is the most accepting. She just didn’t want to be lied to and she was tired of people telling her that she was nuts.

Right, because she always knew that something was going on.

I’m just realizing now that the whole time I was reading your book I was picturing Alice Pearce [the first actress who played Gladys on the series] as Gladys Kravitz and not Sandra Gould [the actress who took over for Gladys after Pearce’s death at the age of 48]. Which also brings me to the two Darrins. I know we talked about it last time that you had Dick Sargent in your mind when you wrote your last book because you saw it as a continuation of the series, but I have to admit the whole time I was reading this book, I could only see Dick York. 

Two Darrins: Dick York and Dick Sargent

It’s funny how polarizing the Dick York-Dick Sargent recast is even after more than 50 years! I was still imagining Dick Sargent but it’s fine by me if you recast it back to Dick York!

I think it’s because how Darrin acts in this book. Even though Dick York’s Darrin was more of a pain in the ass about Samantha’s witchcraft, I always felt that he was more loving to her.

I can see that. I remember Elizabeth Montgomery saying that she thought Darrin was mellowing out about the witchcraft over the years anyway, regardless of who played him. That’s what I went with, that Darrin was having his own journey and that, in a way, everyone in his world finding out about Samantha’s witchcraft was kind of liberating for him because didn’t have to keep his guard up as much and it even makes him learn some things about himself. I think he eventually came to terms with the psychological and physical implications of what he was asking when he wanted his wife and kids to deny that part of themselves. That was even addressed on the series. I’m sure you remember the episode in which Samantha got this disease that was because she was repressing her witchcraft. 

Yes. I was very impressed by how deep you go into the actual physiology of witchcraft and how it affects people who are only half-witches, etc. You could get a PhD in witch biology at this point! How the heck did you come up with all that stuff that sounds so legit?

“Dr. Bombay! Emergency! Come right away!”

(Laughs.) Well, I made a lot of it up, but there were bits and pieces throughout the series where they got into the science of it, especially in the later seasons. Like a sentence here and there, especially when Dr. Bombay was on. I loved exploring that with the kids since they are basically a combination of two different species. I was interested in exploring what made them different but also how they were similar to mortals. That’s an overarching theme in the book, that we are all much more alike than we are different. 

And it’s hard not to apply your themes to some of the situations we’re facing in this country today. I mean, on the one hand, you had Darrin not accepting his wife for who she was, which always evokes issues present for the LGBTQ community, but on the other hand, you have the top echelon of witches basically acting like white supremacists, thinking they are vastly superior to mortals. Such a fascinating dichotomy. And you deal with race issues head on here as well, with the character of Lisa who we saw back in the day in one of the more hard-hitting episodes on the show when she and young Tabitha explore racial prejudice. 

I think the show did a lot of ground-breaking things with inclusivity long before other shows dared to tackle that on television. 

I also loved the complexities surrounding Samantha’s estrangement with her friend  Louise Tate after Louise finds out she‘s a witch. Again, so unexpected and interesting. I don’t want to give it away, we’ll just encourage people to read the book!

Yeah, that just came to me. I wanted to have one character that would have major problems with Samantha and her decisions, and I knew I didn’t want it to be Gladys Kravitz.

I also appreciated you making Abner and Gladys Kravitz explicitly Jewish even though I don’t think that was ever mentioned on the show. 

Part of my attempts at inclusivity.

Which also reminds me of Uncle Arthur — you touched on him being an LGBTQ character very briefly in your last book, I was so happy you brought it out even more here, with some surprising twists involving other beloved characters! 

Samantha and Uncle Arthur (Paul Lynde)

If you look at television in the 1970s, especially the late 70s, these issues were beginning to be addressed, even though to a large degree sexual orientation was still treated as a joke. I really wanted to explore that and show more of Uncle Arthur’s personal life, it just seemed like the natural thing to do. 

And that certainly fits with our memories of Paul Lynde in real life. 

I always think about Elizabeth Montgomery when I write my books since she was so instrumental in infusing the show with these elements of representation. I want to create things that I think she would be happy with if she were still around. I want to honor her legacy. I hope that she would be pleased with the books.

Oh, there’s no question in my mind that Elizabeth Montgomery would love your books. It’s so interesting to me that she’s been gone now for 26 years and yet she’s still so loved by fans, even ones who weren’t born when she died. Such a special woman. 

For sure. I grew up with such a love for Elizabeth Montgomery. When I was 14, I wrote her a very dorky fan letter about some TV movie she was in, Second Sight: A Love Story, in which played a blind woman. A few months later I got an autographed picture back from her in which she referenced something I had written in my letter and even included a little paw print from the guide dog I mentioned that was in the movie. I always thought, how cool is it that this major star took the time to answer this fan letter from a kid in such a personal way. And when I attended the annual Bewitched Fan Fare event for the first time in 2014, I heard story after story like that. It just made me love her even more. 

Well, here’s hoping that no matter what your plans are, the characters will come to you at some point and demand that you escort them through the 1980s. I think we need to see Samantha and the gang grappling with the Reagan years.

Samantha’s Seventies is available on Amazon and wherever books are sold.

…..

–Danny Miller for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Danny’s Classic Conversation Articles Here

Danny Miller is a freelance writer, book editor, and co-author of  About Face: The Life and Times of Dottie Ponedel, Make-up Artist to the StarsYou can read more of Danny’s articles at Cinephiled, or you can follow him on Twitter at @dannymmiller

Posted in Books, Classic Conversations, Classic TV, Interviews, Posts by Danny Miller | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment